|
 |
Original
Rudman Study
New
England Journal of Medicine,
Volume 323 July 5, 1990 Number 1
EFFECTS OF HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE IN MEN OVER 60 YEARS OLD
Daniel
Rudman, M.D., Axel G. Feller, M.D., Hoskote S. Nagraj, M.D., Gregory
A. Gergans, M.D., Pardee Y. Lalitha, M.D., Allen F. Goldberg,
D.D.S., Robert A. Schlenker, Ph.D., Lester Cohn,
M.D., Inge W. Rudman, B.S., and Dale E. Mattson, Ph.D.
Abstract Background.
The
declining activity of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor
1 (IGF-1) axis with advancing age may contribute to the decrease
in lean body mass and the increase in mass of adipose tissue that
occur with aging.
Methods.
To
test this hypothesis, we studied IGF-1 plasma with 21 healthy
men from 61 to 81 years old who had plasma IGF-1 concentrations
of less than 350 U per liter during a six-month base-line period
and a six-month treatment period that followed. During the treatment
period, 12 men (group 1) received approximately 0.03 mg of biosynthetic
human growth hormone per kilogram of body weight subcutaneously
three times a week, and 9 men (group 2) received no treatment.
Plasma IGF-1 levels were measured monthly. At the end of each
period, we measured lean body mass, the mass of adipose tissue,
skin thickness (epidermis plus dermis), and bone density at nine
skeletal sites.
Results.
In group 1, the mean plasma IGF-1 level rose into the youthful
range of 500 to 1500 U per liter during treatment, whereas in
group 2 it remained below 350 U per liter. The administration
of human growth hormone for six months in group 1 was accompanied
by an 8.8 percent increase in lean body mass, a 14.4 percent decrease
in adipose-tissue mass, and a 1.6 percent increase in average
lumbar vertebral bone density (P<0.05 in each instance). Skin
thickness increased .1 percent (P = 0.0). There was no significant
change in the bone density of the radius or proximal femur. In
group 2 there was no significant change in lean body mass, the
mass of adipose tissue, skin thickness, or bone density during
treatment.
Conclusions.
Diminished secretion of growth hormone is responsible in part
for the decrease of lean body mass, the expansion of adipose-tissue
mass, and the thinning of the skin that occurs in old age. (New
England Journal of Medicine, 1990; 323:1-6).
In
middle and late adulthood, all people experience a series of progressive
alterations in body composition. The lean body mass shrinks and
the mass of adipose tissue expands. The contraction in lean body
mass reflects atrophic processes in skeletal muscle, liver, kidney,
spleen, skin, and bone.
These
structural changes have been considered unavoidable results of
aging. It has recently been proposed, however, that reduced availability
of growth hormone in late adulthood may contribute to such changes.
This proposal is based on two lines of evidence. First, after
about the age of 30, the secretion of growth hormone by the pituitary
gland tends to decline. Since growth hormone is secreted in pulses,
mostly during the early hours of sleep, it is difficult to measure
the 24-hour secretion of the substance directly. Growth hormone
secretion can be measured indirectly, however measure the 24-hour
secretion of the substance measure the 24-hour secretion of the
substance directly. Growth hormone secretion can be measured indirectly,
however, by measuring the plasma concentration of insulin-like
growth factor I (IGF-I, also known as somatomedin C), which is
produced and released by the liver and perhaps other tissues in
response to growth hormone. There is little diurnal variation
in the plasma IGF-I concentration, and measurements of it are
therefore a convenient indicator of growth hormone secretion.
Plasma IGF-I concentrations decline with advancing age in healthy
adults. Less than 5 percent of the healthy men 20 to 40 years
old have plasma IGF-I values of less than 350 U per liter, but
the values are below this figure in 30 percent of the healthy
men over 60. Likewise, the nocturnal pulses of growth hormone
secretion becomes smaller or disappear with advanced age. If the
plasma concentration of IGF-I falls below 350 U per liter in older
adults, no spontaneous circulating pulses of growth hormone can
be detected by currently available radioimmunoassay methods. The
concomitant decline in plasma concentrations of both hormones
supports the view that the decrease in IGF-I results from diminished
growth hormone secretion. Second, diminished secretion of growth
hormone is accompanied not only by a fall in the plasma IGF-I
concentration, but also by atrophy of the lean body mass and expansion
of the mass of adipose tissue. These alterations in body composition
caused by growth hormone deficiency can be reversed by replacement
doses of the hormone, as experiments in rodents, children, and
adults 20 to 50 years old have shown. These findings suggest that
the atrophy of the lean body mass and its component organs and
the enlargement of the mass of adipose tissue that are characteristic
of the elderly result at least in part from diminished secretion
of growth hormone. If so, the age-related changes in body composition
should be correctable in part by the administration of human growth
hormone, now readily available as a biosynthetic product.
In
this study we administered biosynthetic human growth hormone for
six months to 12 healthy men from 61 to 81 years old whose plasma
IGF-I concentrations were below 350 U per liter, and we measured
the effects on plasma IGF-I concentration, lean boy mass, adipose-tissue
mass, skin (dermal plus epidermal) thickness, regional bone density,
and mandibular-height ratio (the height of the alveolar ridge
divided by the total height of the mandible). In addition, the
men were monitored for possible adverse effects of the hormone
by means of interviews physical examinations, and standard laboratory
tests. Nine men matched for age and with similar plasma IGF-I
concentrations served as controls.
Methods
Subjects. Healthy
men who were 61 or older and living in the community were recruited
through newspaper advertisements followed by an interview. Entry
criteria (available from the authors on request) included body
weight of 90 to 120 percent of the standard for age, the ability
to administer growth hormone to oneself subcutaneously, and the
absence of indications of major disease. Ninety-five men who answered
the advertisement met criteria that could be ascertained by interview.
Their plasma IGF-I concentrations were then determined twice at
an interval of four weeks Consistent with the results of a previous
study, the plasma IGF-I values in these men ranged from 100 to
2400 U per liter, with an average of 500 U per liter. Thirty-
three of the men had plasma IGF-I values of less than 350 U per
liter on both occasions. These 33 men were then further evaluated
by a medical-history taking, physical examination, differential
blood count, urinalysis, blood-chemistry tests, chest radiography,
and electrocardiography. Twenty-six subjects (1 black and 25 white)
met all the entry criteria and were enrolled in the 12-month protocol
summarized in Table 1
Study Periods.
The men
were seen at regular intervals and tested as shown in Table 1
during the first week of the first, third, and sixth months of
the base-line period. Five men dropped out of the study during
these six months (four for personal reasons and one because carcinoma
of the prostate was detected).
Table 1. Schedule
of Tests During the Base-Line and Treatment Periods
SUNDAY,
JUNE 16, 1990 7:08:56 AM SUNDAY, JUNE 16, 1990 7:08:56 AM SUNDAY,
JUNE 16, 1990 7:08:56 AM
| Test |
Base Line Period |
Treatment Period |
| |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
Mo |
| |
1 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| Physical
Examination |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Hematology* |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Urinalysis* |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Blood
Chemistry* |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Chest
radiography |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Electrocardiography |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Echocardiography |
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Total
body potassium† |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Skin thickness‡ |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Bone density*Š |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Mandibular-heightratio*þ` |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Plasma
IFG1¶ |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Biosynthecic
growth hormone** |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
Total body potassium levels (lean body mass and adipose tissue-mass)
were measured according to the method of Flynn et al. 15
‡ Calculated at the sum of skin thickness of the
right and left dorsal hand and left volar forearm measured with
a Harpenden caliper according to the method of Lawrence and Shuster.16
*Š Measured according to the method of Nagraj et
al.17
*þ` Measured according to the method of Goldberg
et al.18
¶ Measured at Nichols Laboratory, Los Angeles, according
to the method of Furlanetto et al.19
** Administered to group 1 only.
At
the beginning of the seventh month, the 21 men who had completed
the base-line period were randomly assigned to group 1 (growth
hormone group) or group 2 (control group) in a ratio of 3 to 2.
The randomization table was generated by a computer program such
that in each group of five men, three would be assigned to the
growth hormone group and two to the control group. All 21 men
(12 in group 1 and 9 in group 2) completed the treatment period
and continue the study group for this report. Their clinical characteristics
are summarized in Table 2. During the first week of the seventh
month, the men in group 1 were instructed in the subcuntaneious
administration of recombinant biosynthetic human growth hormone
(2.6 IU per milligram of hormone; Eli Lilly). The initial dose
was 0.03 mg per kilogram of body weight, injected three times
a week at 8a.m., the interval between injections being either
one or two days. A sample of venious blood for plasma IGF-I assay
was obtained each month 24 hours after a growth hormone injection.
If the IGF-I level was below 500 U per liter, the dose of hormone
w as increased by 25 percent; if the IGF-I level was above 1500
U per liter, the dose was reduced by 25 percent. The men in group
2 received no injections. The schedule of tests of both groups
during the treatment period is shown in Table 1.
At
the start of the base-line period, the project dietician instructed
each man to follow a diet that furnished 25 to 30 k.cal per kilogram.
The distribution of kilocalories among protein, carbohydrate,
and fat was approximately 15 percent, 50 percent, and 35 percent,
respectively. At each scheduled visit shown in Table 1, the dietitian
analyzed each man's diet on the basis of a 24-hours dietary recall
and instructed the subjects again about the standard diet. The
men were told not to alter their lifestyles (including their use
of tobacco or alcohol and their level or physical activity) during
the 12-month study period.
The
study protocol was carried out with the informed consent of each
subject and with the approval of the human-research committees
of the Medical College of Wisconsin, the Chicago Medical School,
and the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in North Chicago and
Milwaukee.
Table
2. Clinical Characteristics of the Study Subjects.
| Characteristic |
Group1
(N=12) |
Group2
(N=9) |
| Median
age (range) |
67 (61-73) |
68 (65-81) |
| Percent
of ideal body weight- -median (range) |
103 (94-120) |
105 (99-117) |
| |
|
|
| Medical
conditions (no. of subjects) |
|
|
| Degenerative
joint disease |
5 |
2 |
| Benign
prostatic hypertrophy |
3 |
1 |
| Glaucoma |
1 |
1 |
| Cataract |
2 |
1 |
| Arterioscleotic heart disease* |
3 |
1 |
| Gallstones |
0 |
1 |
| Kidney
stone |
1 |
1 |
| Hiatus
hernia |
0 |
1 |
| |
| Medications
(no. of subjects) |
|
|
| Nonsteroidal
antiinflamitory drug |
3 |
1 |
| Pilocarpine
eyedrops |
1 |
1 |
| Cimetidine |
0 |
1 |
*
Defined as history of myocardial infraction or electrocardiographic
abnormality ascribed to coronary artery disease.
Statistical
Analysis
The
methods used to measure each response variable and the locations
where the tests were performed are described in Table 1. The interassay
coeficients of variation for the response variables were as follows:
plasma IGF-I, 7.2 percent; lean body mass, 3.6 percent; adipose-tissue
mass, 6.9 percent; skin thickness, 5.4 percent; and bone density,
2.3 percent (average of nine measured sites).
P
values based on two-tailed matched-pair t-tests were calculated
for the comparisons between the 6-month and 12-month values in
group1 and group 2. In addition, for each response variable the
6-month value was subtracted from the 12-month value to represent
the change in each subject. P values based on two-tailed, unequalvariance,
independent-sample t-tests were then calculated for the comparison
of the changes in response variables between groups 1 and 2.
Results
Clinical
Observations.
All
the men remained healthy, and none had any changes in the results
of differential blood count, urinalysis, blood-chemistry profile,
chest radiography, electrocardiography, or echocardiography during
the 12-month protocol. Specifically, none had edema, fasting hyperglycemia
(>6.6 mmol of glucose per liter), an increase in blood pressure
to more than 160/90 mm Hg, ventricular hypertrophy, or a local
reaction to human growth hormone, nor did their serum cholesterol
or triglyceride concentrations change significantly. In group
1, however, both the men (" SE) systolic blood pressure and fasting
plasma glucose concentration were significantly higher (P<0.05
by matched-pair t-test) at the end of the experimental period
than at the end of the base-line period (127.2"5.2 vs. 119.1"
3.6mm Hg and 5.8" 0.2 vs. 5.4" 0.2 mmol per liter, respectively).
Table
3. Effect of the Administration of Human Growth Hormone on Plasma
IGF-1 Concentrations in Healthy Older Men*
| |
Plasma IGF-1 |
| |
Base Line
Period |
Treatment Period |
| |
Mo 1 |
Mo. 3 |
Mo.6 |
Mo.7 |
Mo.8 |
| Group
1 |
240 +-86 |
230+-97 |
230+-66 |
830 +-339H |
680+-180H |
| |
Mo. 9 |
Mo.10 |
Mo.11 |
Mo.12 |
|
| |
720+-350H |
810+-305H |
810+-192H |
910+-312H |
|
| Group
2 |
Mo 1 |
Mo. 3 |
Mo. 6 |
Mo. 7 |
Mo.8 |
| |
240+-69 |
240+-126 |
240+-108 |
200+-126 |
220+-123 |
| |
Mo. 9 |
Mo.10 |
Mo.11 |
Mo.12 |
|
| |
240+-177 |
180+-126 |
240+-186 |
300+-201 |
|
*Values
are means +-SD HP<0.05 for the comparison between groups
Plasma IGF-I
Concentration
In
group 1, the mean plasma IGF-I concentration ranged from 200 to
250 U per liter throughout the base-line period (Table 3). Within
one month after the administration of growth hormone had been
initiated, the mean IGF-I level rose to 830 U per liter (P<0.05),
and it remained near this value for the next five months. Eight
of the 12 men in group 1 required no adjustment in their initial
dose of growth hormone. Two required an upward adjustment of 25
percent, and two required a downward adjustment of 25 percent.
The mean plasma IGF-I concentration in group 2 remained in the
range of 180 to 300 U per liter throughout the base-line and treatment
periods.
Lean
Body Mass, Adipose-Tissue Mass, Skin Thickness, Bone Density and
Mandibular-Height Ratio
Table
4 shows the mean values for the other response variables at the
end of the base-line period (6 months) and the end of the treatment
period (12 months). There was no significant change in weight
in either group. In group 1, several response variables had changed
significantly after 12 months. Lean body mass and the average
density of the lumbar vertebrae increased by 8.8 percent (P<0.0005)
and 1.6 percent (P<0.04), respectively, and adipose-tissue
mass decreased by 14.4 percent (P<0.005). The sum of skin thicknesses
at four sites increased .1 percent (P = 0.07). The small average
change in lumbar vertebral bone density (only 0.02 g per square
centimeter) was statistically significant because of very little
variability in individual results. The bone density of the radius
and proximal femur and the ratio of the height of the alveolar
ridge to total mandibular height did not change significantly.
In group 2 none of these variables changed significantly. The
change in the lean body mass was significantly greater in group
1 than in group 2 (P<0.018), but the differences in changes
in skin thickness and adipose-tissue mass between groups did not
reach statistical significance in this small series (P = 0.10
and 0.13, respectively).
Table
4. Effect of the Administration of Human Growth Hormone on Weight,
Lean Body Mass, Adipose-Tissue Mass, Skin Thickness, and Bone
Density in Healthy Older Men
| Variable |
Group |
End of
Base Line Period |
End of
Base Line Period |
P ValueH |
Difference
in ChangesI |
| Weight
(kg) |
1 2 |
77.2+-11.4
83.3+-11.1 |
78.2+-12.1
83.3+-9.7 |
0.26 0.97 |
+1.0 (-1.4
to 3.4) |
| Lean Body
Mass (kg) |
1 2 |
53.0+-7.4
54.2+-7.1 |
57.7+-9.1
55.2+-7.3 |
0.05 0.17 |
+3.7 (+0.7
to +6.6) |
| Adipose
Tissue Mass (kg) |
1 2 |
24.1+-5.0
29.0+-6.4 |
20.6+-5.6
28.0+-4.0 |
0.05 0.43 |
-2.4 (-5.7
to +0.8) |
| Sum of
Skin Thickness at four Sites (mm) |
1 2 |
9.9+-1.2
9.3+-0.9 |
10.6+-1.5
9.23+-0.80 |
0.07 0.69 |
+0.8 (-0.1
to +1.7) |
| Bone Density
(g/cm2) Mid-shaft radius |
1 2 |
0.74+-0.10
0.76+-0.10 |
0.74+-0.12
0.71+-0.07 |
0.85 0.09 |
+0.40
(-0.02 to +0.10) |
| Distal
radius |
1 2 |
0.37+-0.07
0.34+-0.04 |
0.36+-0.08
0.33+-0.05 |
0.12 0.26 |
-0.004
(-0.03 to +0.02) |
| Average
lumbar vertebrae 1-4 |
1 2 |
1.23+-0.12
1.29+-0.25 |
1.25+-0.13
1.29+-0.26 |
0.04 0.64 |
+0.006
(-0.04 to +0.05) |
| Ward's
Triangle |
1 2 |
0.70+-0.14
0.70+-0.17 |
0.69+-0.13
0.70+-0.17 |
0.15 0.69 |
-0.018
(-0.08 to +0.05) |
| Greater
trochanter |
1 2 |
0.85+-0.13
0.81+-0.15 |
0.85+-0.13
0.81+-0.13 |
0.72 0.55 |
+0.007
(-0.05 to +0.03) |
| Fremoral
neck |
1 2 |
0.92+-0.15
0.89+-0.14 |
0.91+-0.14
0.85+-0.14 |
0.53 0.14 |
-0.029
(-0.08 to +0.03) |
| Mandibular
height ratio |
1 2 |
0.45+-0.15
0.47+-0.12 |
0.46+-0.11
0.47+-0.12 |
0.87 0.98 |
-0.003
(-0.07 to +0.06) |
*
Plus-minus values are means +-SD
HP
values are for the change from base line, by matched pair 1-test
I
The difference in changes (12 month value minus 6 month value)
is the average in group 1 minus the average change in group 2.
Values in parentheses are 95 percent confidence intervals, calculated
by independent-sample, unequal-variance 1-test.
Discussion
The
21 men studied were representative of the approximately one third
of all men 60 to 80 years old who have plasma IGF-I concentrations
of less than 350 U per liter (as compared with a range of 500
to 1500 U per liter in healthy men 20 to 40 years old). Our findings
cannot be generalized to the approximately two thirds of all men
over 60 who have plasma IGFK-I concentrations of more than 350
U per liter or to women of a similar age. Furthermore, our entry
criteria focused the study on an overly healthy subgroup of older
men.
In
the absence of obesity, below-normal weight, or liver disease,
a plasma IGF-I concentration of less than 350 U per liter in older
men generally signifies that they secrete very little growth hormone.
To verify this explanation for the low plasma IGF-I concentration
in these men, it would be necessary to measure serum growth hormone
levels at frequent intervals for 24 hours or to determine the
24-hour urinary excretion of growth hormone. We did not do this,
but Ho et al. found that the 24-hour integrated serum growth hormone
level was markedly lower in the men over 55 than in men 18 to
33 years old. An alternative explanation for a low plasma IGF-I
concentration is decreased production of plasma IGF-I binding
proteins. Most of the IGF-I plasma is bound to these proteins,
but their concentrations vary little in healthy people who eat
a normal diet.
In
the 12 men in group 1, initially low plasma IGF-I concentrations
were raised to the normal range for young adult men by the dose
of growth hormone administered, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis
or hormone resistance. The dose, approximately 0.03 mg per kilogram
three times a week, was based on published estimates of the rate
of growth hormone secretion in young men and was comparable to
or smaller than doses given previously to children with growth
hormone deficiency and young adults. The plasma IGF-I responses
to this dose in these older men were similar in magnitude to those
in younger people. That "replacement" rather than pharmacologic
doses were being administered was confirmed by the plasma IGF-I
measurements, which remained within the range for healthy young
adults (500 to 1500 U per liter) throughout the treatment period
(Table 3). We conclude that in aging men with low plasma IGF-I
concentrations hepatic responsiveness to human growth hormone
is not impaired, and the decline in plasma IGF-1 concentrations
in such men results from growth hormone deficiency rather than
growth hormone resistance. The increase in plasma IGF-1 levels
that occurs when growth hormone is administered to children with
growth hormone deficiency reflects not only augmented hepatic
production of IGF-1, but also increased production of one of the
binding proteins that transport IGF-1. The extent to which the
production of IGF-1 binding protein is increased by the administration
of growth hormone has not yet been studied in adults.
At
the beginning of our study, adverse reactions to human growth
hormone were thought to be unlikely because physiologic doses
were being used. Furthermore, similar or larger doses have not
caused undesired reactions in children or young adults. Nevertheless,
it remained possible that this dose, when given for six months
to older subjects, might cause some manifestation of hypersomatotropism,
such as edema, hypertension, diabetes,k or cardiomegaly. Although
none of these conditions developed, there were small increases
in the mean systolic blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose
concentration of the group of men who received growth hormone.
The
magnitude of the increases in lean body mass and the decreases
in adipose-tissue mass (8.8 and -14.2 percent above and below
base line, respectively) in the aging men who received human growth
hormone for six months was similar to the magnitude of these responses
in children and young adults treated with similar or lower doses
for three to six months, a comparison that provides further evidence
that tissue responsiveness to growth hormone and IGFK-I is not
altered in older men. Until now, the evidence for such a conclusion
came only from short-term nitrogen-balance experiments.
Salomon
et al. reported that the administration of human growth hormone
in a dose of 0.49 unit per kilogram per week (0.19 mg per kilogram
per week) for six months to adults 20 to 50 years old who had
growth hormone deficiency lowered the serum cholesterol concentration
significantly. Serum cholesterol concentrations did not change
in our study, in which the does of growth hormone was about half
as large (0.9 mg per kilogram per week). The divergent results
could reflect differences in the subjects' ages, the degree of
growth hormone deficiency, the dose of hormone, or all three.
In
rodents, the increase in lean body mass in response to growth
hormone is due to increases in the volume of skeletal muscle,
skin, liver, kidney, and spleen. In young human subjects, an enlargement
of muscle and kidney induced by growth hormone has been documented,
other organs have not yet been assessed. The reduction in adipose-tissue
mass when children with growth hormone deficiency are treated
with human growth hormone is associated with a redistribution
of adipose tissue from abdominal to peripheral areas. It is not
known however, whether the increase in lean body mass and the
decrease in adipose-tissue mass are qualitatively as well as quantitatively
similar in old and young human subjects.
Biosynthetic
human growth hormone had no detectable effect on the bone density
of the radius or proximal femur in the aging men but it increased
the density of the lumbar vertebrae by about 1.6 percent. Although
the decrease in bone density with advancing age in men may be
due in part to diminished secretion of growth hormone, longer
periods of administration of human growth hormone will be required
before a final conclusion can be drawn regarding its efficacy
in reversing that decrease. A similar interpretation applies to
the lack of increase in the mandibular-height ratio.
The
findings in this study are consistent with the hypothesis that
the decrease in lean body mass, the increase in adipose-tissue
mass, and the thinning of the skin that occur in older men are
caused in part by reduced activity of the growth hormone - IGF-I
axis, and can be restored in part by the administration of human
growth hormone. The effects of six months of human growth hormone
on lean body mass and adipose-tissue mass were equivalent in magnitude
to the changes incurred during 10 to 20 years of aging. Among
the questions that remain to be addressed are the following: What
will be the benefits and what will be the nature and frequency
of any adverse effects when larger numbers of elderly subjects
and other doses of human growth hormones are studied? What organs
are responsible for the increase in lean body mass, and do their
functional capacities change as well? Only when such questions
are answered can the possible benefits of human growth hormone
in the elderly be explored. Since atrophy of muscle and skin contributes
to the frailty of older people the potential benefits of growth
hormone merit continuing attention and investigation.
Back
to Previous Page
Copyright
© 2000 BIE Health.
|
|